DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
SIN
Docket No: 4341-14
2829-13
20 April 2015
This is in reference to your latest reconsideration request
received on 25 February 2014. You previously petitioned the
Board and were advised in our letter of 27 January 2014, that
your application had been denied.
Your current request has also been carefully and conscientiously
examined. However, given that it does not contain new evidence
that was not previously considered by the Board, your request
must again be denied. In accordance with the foregoing, your
application is hereby administratively closed.
It is regrettable that the circumstances of your case are such
that the Board will not process any additional reviews and this
matter is considered a final action. However, if you wish to
continue to seek relief you will need to present your concerns
a court of appropriate jurisdiction.
Sinc
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
to
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1774 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2014. The Board carefully considered all of the arguments raised in your application and the evidence your counsel submitted regarding those claims. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2389 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Members who are retired are not eligible to transfer. You also stated in your application that you “submitted a retirement request of 1 August 2014."
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3976 14
However, in light your highly decorated award (Silver Star), your case was presented to the Board out of respect for your exceptional service to our country. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Accordingly, your application...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11045 14
You are advised that when a request for corrective action is denied by the Board, sitting in executive session, new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered must be submitted in order to have the Board reconsider its decision. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence within one year from the date of the Board’ s decision. consequently, when applying for a correction of an official record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1663 14
Additionally, the Board considered your response to the advisory opinion dated 20 September 2014. appearance, -However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. correction of an official naval to demonstrate the existence of this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2156 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2014. 4 However after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4167 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SJN Docket No: 4167-14 11203-0908 8 April 2015 This is in reference to your latest reconsideration request received on 20 February 2014. Your current request has also been carefully and conscientiously examined. However, given that it does not contain new evidence that was not previously considered by the Board, your request must again be denied.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5099 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. evidence not previously considered by the Board its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1323 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the.applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1036 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, his naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ~ Therefore, your case was provided to the Board as is for final determination. Consequently, when applying for @ correction of an official naval record, the purden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error of injustice.